Greetings Eye,
These are deep questions you ask (with equally deep insights), and I have to ask these questions myself, often during the times when I interact with family, friends, and co-workers. The implications are very real and practical (not just abstract). Always is the question looming: What will
really help the person who seems to be suffering (including myself)?
When I release that question in inner stillness, the answer almost inevitably returns as:
less is more. So, I try to remember that, restraining my great propensity to launch into full-blown explanations of the mechanics of suffering. I have a love for words, and I love to be playful, penetrating, dynamic, and so on...with the gift of language. But, silence is golden--not just inner, but outer too. The silent actions of love/radiance/unity speak louder than the long-winded words of the intellect.
But what you write also makes me think of an important distinction, which I think you've so keenly tapped into: there is a difference between
being nice and
being kind. Often, being nice/polite is something that occurs on the surface, but does not necessarily reflect the inner condition of a person. However, being genuinely kind and loving is something that radiates from inner silence. In our American culture, many people wear masks with plastic smiles and hyperactive cheer. It's part of the obsession to appear as perfect--no blemishes, no defects, no disabilities. But the oddities, weirdness, and imperfections are what makes life fascinating and beautiful--to me. Also, some of the most loving people in my life have been those not too afraid to be a little crude with their humor or in calling people out (but their crude expressions and impoliteness have not been laced with malice or vindictiveness).
That being said, this a very well-maintained forum, and one of the excellent policies is no guru bashing. So, I want to fully abide and honor that.
Still, I think it's important to examine and challenge the teachings (and even agendas) of well-known teachers.
Just today, I was thinking...you know, when I have internal diatribes filled with "projected annoyance" (as you say), I'm going to
samyamize my targets. At first, I was like: No! These gurus don't need my prayers or my energy! But then I thought: Aha, it's actually my
relationship with them that needs the prayers and the samyama energy.
And I also really, really like this in your above post:
I feel that I personally have allowed my new focus on oneness and non-violence to engender some idea that I've somehow done something wrong, that the universe could somehow have a problem with the actions of my life which were the inevitable result of its very own giving rise to my existence as a separate entity, the very actions which have led me to discover a higher, cosmic focus and without which I would have never discovered anything.That is why I'm so drawn to and fond of AYP teachings. Yogani says...neither the ego nor the mind nor the collected karma of our actions is our enemy. These are in fact the gateways to liberation. Other teachers seems to constantly portray the mind and ego as enemies. Not so, here. The mind and ego are tools for transcendence.
Thanks for sharing your very real and contemplative words. It is so refreshing to find like-minded souls in these forums.
Rock on!