quote:
Originally posted by meg
. If we surrender to a Higher Power and say in earnest "Thy will be done", it seems redundant to continually remind Daddy of our needs.
Meg, that's a really important insight. I'm not sure you realize (nor do you need to!) how far this is from where you were just a few months ago.
As for me, i've been big on the "thy will be done" thing for some time now. But Yogani's post in this thread has opened my eyes to the fact that we are what plays out that will. It's going to take me a while to really inhabit that understanding, as I've been pulling the other way, toward stasis and introversion. Maybe there simply must be a period of passive hollowing-out.... "letting the spirit in" before you "let the spirit move you" to put it in gospel terms. After you recognize the toy steering wheel for what it is, a hiccup-like period of non-doing seems inevitable.
I don't want anything from big daddy. I see quite clearly how richly beautiful it all is, just as-is. Even if I'm not gratefully aware of it 24/7, I at least recognize 24/7 that any perceived shortfall is in my clouded viewpoint rather than in the universe itself. I grimace at the notion of playing out the frightful shadows of my subconscious and samskaras as I move through the world, but I am increasingly aware that that's what happens anyway. So refusing to take up the divine gauntlet - because I realize any such noble intention will be coopted by egoic subconscious - isn't the answer. We slime the universe with our every action and thought (paradoxically enough, we only notice the extent of this pollution as we purify!)...our karma does not stay within our perceived boundaries of self. So it's not like it can get much worse! At least intending to allow ourselves to be divinely guided as we pick up groceries and chat with the neighbors is as good as anything. Just as I fool myself into thinking I'm allowing myself to be purified in meditation (even though I'm aware of how much I'm still guiding and holding on, with the exception of a few truly selfless moments here and there), I may as well fool myself when I stand up from my meditation cushion, as well.
Thing is, all that hesitation and trepidation is for someone with comparatively noble-sounding, selfless-seeming desires...who's been mostly purged of the compulsion to hope the universe fills my perceived emptiness. If my intentions were for money, sex, power, etc, I just can't understand how thinking about any of this stuff would be anything but an amplifier of everything yoga seeks to quell. There's nothing "bad" about craving the things ego craves. But satisfying ego via spiritual practices ("I want a vacation in Bermuda, and will use my toolset of surrender, gratitude, intent, action, and the silence I've cultivated in meditation to get it") is not just unspiritual, but anti-spiritual. Refining the very essence of egoic grabbiness into a pill and wrapping it in a big gooey sandwich of silence and bhakti to get what we want is a twisted thing to do, from my perspective, whether it works or not. And the gooey outer coating, which has the FLAVOR of yoga, can easily fool us into thinking it's yoga. It's not. There's a word for it: occult. The use of spiritual tools to get what we (meaning our ego minds) want in the world of samsara/maya. Occult is not about bubbling spleen of hyena in a cauldron while intoning special words in Latin. This law of attractions crap is exactly it. Feh.
You have it exactly right, Meg. Don't touch it. Just trust and open.
Yogani believes there is an inherent safety catch in the system: that by the time you have cultivated sufficient silence and bhakti to make any of this work, you've been purified sufficiently to use the power selflessly. Unfortunately, Yogani, who is otherwise extraordinarily wise, declines to take into account the evidence of a great many people who've cultivated far more silence than any of us yet whose intentions remained not only impure but absolutely stink-o. We all know the usual names.