I'm cool with another thread; "after you" (go ahead and start it; I'll chime in).
Other Systems is probably best.
I wasn't meaning to diminish anyone else's definition of enlightenment or the way there, by the way.
It's just that all the form-oriented practices seem less and less important over time, as well as from the perspective of timeless awareness (meaning: it's not *about* the practices; it's about what is revealed
via the practices, whatever they may or may not be.)
And I was also respectfully suggesting that it may be possible that some of the things you've been taught are essential may not actually be essential for everyone.
This is simply true of any tradition which says you "must" do this or that.
Did Ramana Maharshi do all the things you've been taught are necessary? How about Nisargadatta? How about enlightened Taoists or Buddhists or Christians or Sufis or Alchemists or Kabbalists?
Kriya Yoga is a highly effective system, but it's not the only one, by far, as I'm pretty sure you know (even Yogananda didn't opine that only Kriyabans became enlightened).
Enlightenment isn't evaluated by what the body-mind can do; true enlightenment isn't evaluated at all.
The actuality of the Self/True-Nature is known in ongoing experience, or it's not, period-full-stop.
Even enlightenment is a relative term.
There's living in-from-as the knowing of true nature, or there's dreaming of evaluation and limitation within the greater scope of reality.
Enlightenment, if it's an applicable term at all, is applicable to the cessation of the dream, and the attendant revelation of Self/True Nature.
All practices are supports; no one specific practice, or even series of them, are essential to enlightenment, and no systems' practices and benchmarks are an accurate measuring stick for all.
(Even the term Maya comes from the Sanskrit root "Maa" - "to measure"; they don't just make this stuff up, ya know.
)
To say that enlightenment requires such and such is like trying to discuss the third dimension from the perspective of the second, or more accurately, it's like trying to discuss the waking state from the perspective of the dreaming state ... "problematic at best".
Liberation is awareness of our true nature as wholeness, in ongoing experience.
Living-Knowing/Awareness in ongoing experience is the natural state; the result of the cessation of ego and its erroneous evaluations (Yoga is the cessation of mind-disturbances; Yogash Chitta-vrtti-nirodhah, as Yoga Sturas 1.2 says).
And so, it's like I'm saying "San Francisco is great!"
And it's like you're responding, "But you don't understand; you have to do such and such and then thus and such, or you can't be in San Francisco!"
And it's like I'm shrugging and saying "Okay", as I enjoy the view of the Bay, as I ride a cable car from Union Square down toward Fisherman's Wharf.
Enlightenment is everywhere; enlightenment is all there is; none of us has it more than anyone else; it's life itself, awareness itself; animating all.
Some of us are just conscious of the full-range of awareness-consciousness (aka the Self, enlightenment, whatever).
Others of us aren't conscious of it, yet. We all will be, though; it's reality; it's actually pretty hard to miss.
Just realize that what you're looking for is what you're actually looking with, and you're most of the way t/here, now.
Awareness is a single field.
Tattvam Asi.
You Are That.
I Am That.
We All Am That.
And That's That.