Hi Anthem,
I'd be happy to try to answer that, regarding the self-mythologization. I wouldn't have gotten the impression of charlatanry per se directly, so I'll leave that one to Guy.
Let me emphasize firstly that I think 'The Power of Now' is a great book and a great service. I agree with everything you said about it.
Let me emphasize secondly that I am saying that self-mythologization is 'par for the course' and probably quite unconscious. So I don't by any means single out Eckhart Tolle for it. In fact, if anything he stands out among famous spiritual teachers as being low in self-mythologization --- very low.
Which is why, in a way, it might be particularly unfair in my post that self-mythologization is mentioned in connection with Eckhart Tolle.
OK, let me explain what I mean by self-mythologization and how it seems to be extremely common among spiritual teachers: self-mythologization among spiritual teachers manifests in the quality of the role in which they inject themselves. This role is prepared for them by the myths of the past, by the great guru/saviour/messiah myths, maybe even by our 'archetypes', and by their tendencies.
I believe they become a little inflated from this role and stop speaking person-to-person in a totally honest, open and truthful way. They don't tend to say 'I don't know' or 'I'm wondering', because that would detract from the myth they are building around themselves.
They mythologize their own progress and path. They often mythologize it in a way that makes it look as if their own particular progress was independent, and that it was not helped by other people and things. Or, to the extent that they were helped by others, the role of the others is subsidiary, and lower-status than their own. They assume a posture as if they are an independent (or final) point of light, an isolated genius, a new Source. They are the Lone Hero.
Has this happened with Tolle? I think a little, yes. [ Not sure I am being fair to Tolle here -- haven't given him benefit of doubt ] I alluded to it in an earlier post. I believe he was helped significantly by a number of teachers and paths (including Zen) **after** his partial enlightenment experience. But there is very little credit given to these paths and teachers, in fact, they are downplayed. He doesn't say something like 'Some of my great teachers and buddies in zen and other traditions helped me to find more securely what their great masters enjoy' -- no, that wouldn't be Lone Hero -- instead he said something very Lone Hero like 'he realized that they were all looking for what he already had'.
This thing may play in with your own observation that his heart chakra is not 'fully opened'. A person whose heart chakra is fully opened is not inclined to go for Lone Hero and is much less susceptible to falling into an inflated role; they will tend to speak person to person in a totally honest way, which manifests their vulnerability and interdependence. Any role activity that draws you out of that relationship of interdependence, is a role that draws you only because 'the heart' is partially lost or not properly grown. Lone Hero only arises when 'the heart' is not fully developed and healthy.
I could be wrong about Tolle in particular (though I think then that the 'wise ant' could find something useful in what I said about spiritual teachers as a group). Regarding Tolle in particular, this is just a set of impressions, possibly even just a forumite shooting his mouth off unfairly, not the result of a deep study. But my own gut feeling is that there is indeed some truth in it.
Let me know what you think. If you think I've gotten it totally wrong about Tolle, don't spare me.
Best regards,
-David