I didn't agree that that was 'brilliant'. No-one singled out gurus here, rather someone, who had trouble with a guru (whom I expect may have been misbehaving), came here for some help and perspective, thinking it might be a good place to find it.
In any situation that can be called guru-cultic situation, if a person is harmed/wronged by a guru, it is turned back on the disciple, as if to deny or wash over wrongdoing on the part of the guru, and indicate that the disciple has merely failed in perspective, and merely needs to improve in it.
I don't agree with that approach. The approach is in fact often tantamount to a denial of abuse, and therefore the enabling of abuse. The mythologization of the guru is really a major enabler of the abuse. My first line of help is to help them acknowledge that the mythology was incorrect: this person was never what they were promoted to be; a lie was lived. And bad things followed from that.