David, Thanks a lot.
Of course I am not playing with the forum or with you in the first place. I’m playing with my own mind. And of course, my ‘playing’ is neither perfectly pure nor perfectly good, which I also never pretended here. I occasionally try and make it possibly pure and good, or at least try and go into that direction, but as far as I remember my posts here, I’d always admitted myself being imperfect, impure, and full of ‘bad’ emotions. I’m working hard to get rid of them gradually in as far as I am able to.
As to my ‘playing’, I experiment with my mind in the first place, and use the reaction of people to certain energy combinations as helpful laboratory equipment to measure and evaluate the results my energy modifications bring about. In that process I make my own mind an object of temporary transformations and, being interested in the objective evaluation of the energies at first place, I am ready to go as far as make my temporary expressions imbecilic, stupid, useless, promoting enmity and anger etc. I prioritize the broad experiment and not the temporary good or bad results I achieve in my transient relationships. That’s a natural way any researcher goes. A car designer can’t help crushing a hundred cars in tests and experiments to finally build one that is one level better than all the others. In spiritual terms this is a never-ending process of improvement through negation of mistakes.
When I speak to this (and many other) audiences, I don’t even bother trying to be nice and getting some positive reactions. I focus all my attention on the observation of the pure effects (both bad and good) or the subtle energy changes I always experiment with. Moreover, I told this already, I intentionally overemphasize the unclear, dark, or ‘questionable’ energy expressions to get a better view of them and have more material for research. It’s like intentionally injecting a virus into my own veins in order to better understand all the details and phenomena related to the disease I’m currently experimenting with.
If I really wanted to be ‘nice’ with everyone here, I could do much better than I currently do, you know this, David. But being ‘nice’ has a lower priority for me than being ‘wise’, being knowledgeable about both good and bad things and all their peculiarities.
Now, let me ask you a question.
What do you think requires more courage and ‘warrior’ skills:
* to do things in front of the audience which you know in advance the audience is going to heap dirt upon, to despise; the things you know would make you an idiot in the eyes of an audience; the things you know perfectly well would make the people your enemies – and all this just to test some of the theories (or even just small details of the theories) you find important on your spiritual path; or
* to humiliate oneself in front of the audience knowing in advance this is going to bring positive reaction and will do good to all your relationships with the people you humiliate yourself in front of.
Well, a warrior must be impeccable (as far as he/she can). But it is the impeccability related to following your chosen path, rather than impeccability required to make a good impression in the society. I’m not after the brilliant (seemingly spiritually perfect) facade of my soul. I’m after the inner perfection/wisdom, which, first of all, is the field of endless improvement, and which includes the profound understanding of all the imperfections and their functioning.