Hello Community,
Just a little clarification.
Is navi kriya done with/during external retention?Like in it's basic start-off form it's been described as kind of dynamic uddiyana bandha done in your asana routine.
Then the relavant lesson goes on to describe further applications( say within SBP with other associated bandha and mudras as they have been cultured and refined) and even further developments of this practice/technique devolped in conjunction with baseer-line practices.Also designed to coax the nervous system into further openings and eventually pave the way for whole body mudra etc.
I know it can be a razor-edge moving from the base line into being more gressive by notching up the gears with the likes of the power of uddiyan, nauli navi kriya,spinal bhastrika.I know AYP can really get lot more agressive that the tools i have used. I think YMK is what i have used in the past nudge me forward with interesting results.
I am really trying tounderstand how the progression of ecstatic conductivity is systematised in the lessons by being quite clear on the instructions laid out in the lessons.
Also when you do it with spinal breathing is it a succession ,done in sequence, of little micro-movments of flexing and releasing associated mudras and bandhas from the plevic store-house upwards through the abdomen/diaprhagm and neck with kechari mudra and finally sambhavi mudra and then doing this in sequence then in reverse( and i know it should happen more naturally and intuitively with regular practice) as you exhale on the down passage. Does your SBP cycle last pretty long like up to , i don't know , at least 3 seconds- 10-15secs or what?
Okay we start off with ajana & root with SBP, then we can introduce YMK which introduces uddiyana ( and jandhara bhanda and retention caused bandhas are coonventionally practiced with kumbhaka & it's external K) for the very first time- No?
Personally i have'nt got to uddiyana. But i have looked at other tantric traditions and they prescribe something called agnisara kriya and swana pranayam before uddiyan and then nauli. But to me the agnisara kriya which they prescribed before, rather than afterwards seemed to bear more resemblance to navi kriya. The difference though is that your navi kriya can be developed with more associated mudras & bandha and can be integrated with SBPBut if some could just clairfy how that is done,then my understanding of this middle portion of the obstruction matrix within the context of the AYP system as a whole might be somewhat clearer.
Here is the lesson i might benefit from clarification on, for clarity's sake:-
http://www.aypsite.com/plus/275.htmlI don't mean to cause any confusion.I think it's because there is more than one development and application.
I think i had such a rough kundalini drive from the start of my yoga journey then i've kinda thought that things could'nt get worse especially seeing as i had nothing like the extraordinary intelligence and seeming magic of a system as complete and minutely worked out as AYP.Plus i have that cunning ally self-pacing which serves to temper and regulate the unwary student couppled with deep meditation..
Sorry if this post is long.Am just trying to understand the systematisation & progression of practices within the whole system so ican progress and safely.Sometimes i have wondered i have been too cautious and held back from being more agressive.I would say the solar plexus enhancement to DM & Deep Meditation can be my sensitive points if done over-done.In fact the solar enhancment did'nt realy work for me.I avoid that one- i found it aggravating.I just don't do it.
Also another minor point- i have been contracting ashwini with SBP but have been thinking since the seat of muladhara/root is often associated with the perinem, then contracting it with ashwini or the perineum on it's own- does that not make more sense?.Especially if you find sitting insiddhasan proper for extended periods somewhat challenging because the heel cannot funtion to stimulate muladhara so well ,with suitable comfort and relaxation in mind. in meditative asana.
I hope this makes sense and welcome any thoughts.
The great thing about AYP is it is firmly rooted in the science of yoga,free of superstition or non-secular nonsense (that you might find in more religious sounding traditions) while still bhakti-inspired ( just read the forum for two secs...lol), and it's explanations clear up a great deal of possible confusion on the level of theory.
P.S--I'm just not totally clear, i think, on that particular lesson/practice and i know it might be difficult to summarise it JUST in a few lines.