Hey Carson,
Good post. Thanks!
I'm thinking that the heart may serve as a spiritual transformer or balancer between the totality of activity in the top 3 chakras and the totality of activity in the bottom 3 chakras.
I hope I'm not imposing my will on interpretation of scriptural imagery, but rather making inferences based upon and drawn from an open mind. Of course, even an open mind can be mistaken!
Willingness to experiment hermeneutically seems personally necessary when others are not present with me to guide my spiritual interpretations and inferences.
The heart with its arterial and venous flows may be referenced in the prologue of Ecclesiastes:
quote:
Then back to its circling goes the wind. Into the sea [heart chamber?] go all the rivers, and yet the sea is never filled [because of outgoing arterial flow?], and still to their goal the rivers go.
Many construe the heart only as a metaphor for consciousness or bliss, etc., or as a metaphor for love or devotion.
But where spiritual
practice is concerned, could we be overlooking or even dismissing something vitally important?
First words and concluding words in a spiritual work can be pregnant with significance.
Consider the import of the opening words and the concluding words that the English Christian mystic Richard Rolle (died 1349) chooses, I believe with care and spiritual craft, for the Prologue of his
Fire of Love:
quote:
I was more astonished than I can put into words when, for the first time, I felt my heart glow hot and burn. I experienced the burning not in my imagination but in reality, as if it were being done by a physical fire...
...because I will try to show the superheated and supernatural feeling of love to everyone, the title The Fire of Love is selected for this book.
Note that Rolle above includes explicit reference to "imagination". Bear in mind, what I could is a translation from the Latin by M.L. del Mastro, available used on Amazon.com.
Despite what seems to be an explicit disavowal, Could Rolle be alluding to deliberate light/fire imaging or active visualization of some sort in his spiritual practice?
Would a student who is watchful for irony in spiritual writing, and therefore "contrarian" to prevailing opinion, be enticed and therefore be inclined to follow up on this lead for the few?
newpov